Which is the WRONG response to reviewers if we don’t agree with their comments?
Ignore those comments or explain what we originally meant.
举一反三
- Which one is NOT the good advices on responding to reviewers? </p></p>
- Which one is the good action in responding to reviewers?</p></p>
- Which one is<br/>not the good advices on responding to reviewers? A: We need to<br/>examine carefully all the comments made by the reviewers and the<br/>Associate Editor. B: We have to<br/>differentiate those comments that must be fully addressed from those<br/>that are desirable to be addressed. C: We only need to<br/>address the comments that they are correct as we believe. D: We need to<br/>respond to EACH and EVERY point raised by the reviewer and the<br/>referee.
- Which of the following is WRONG about the title of scientific paper? </p></p>
- We agree to set up a meeting for this issue. (请问该句的否定句是?) A: We don't agree to set up a meeting for this issue. B: We not agree to set up a meeting for this issue. C: We didn't agree to set up a meeting for this issue.
内容
- 0
Which of the following is WRONG about using Powerpoint to make presentations? </p></p>
- 1
We believe we can______ if you agree to pay by D/P at sight.
- 2
If the reviewer gives a lot of critical comments and requests for modification, what are the correct attitudes we should have? </p></p>
- 3
Which statement is WRONG about sharing credit in writing scientific paper? </p></p>
- 4
We often need to hear a message repeated, because we often don’t “get it” the first time. What does “get it ” mean here in paragraph 1? </p></p>