Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
A: Remoteness of Damage
B: Absolute Privilege
C: Legalised by prescription
D: Contributory Negligence
A: Remoteness of Damage
B: Absolute Privilege
C: Legalised by prescription
D: Contributory Negligence
举一反三
- 中国大学MOOC: Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
- The third pedestrian knocked at the window ______. A: to tell the driver what time it was B: to ask the time C: to see what the driver was doing
- For what did the policewoman stop the car A: The car was too old. B: The car driver was heavily drank. C: The policeman needed a car. D: The car driver broke the speed limit.
- Which of the following statements is INCORRECT According to Simpson, he stopped at the pedestrian crossing because ______. A: the passenger in the front seat didn’t wear seatbelt B: there were two elderly people on the road C: the other driver was speeding up D: a police officer stopped him
- . The driver was caught ______ the speed limit on the road and got a speeding ticket.