The phrase “fake news” is used to describe false or exaggerated stories published in the media with questionable motives.
The phrase “fake news” is used to describe false or exaggerated stories published in the media with questionable motives.
然而,大多数美国人对中国和中国人民是否有正确的了解,这一点并不能确定。 (questionable)
然而,大多数美国人对中国和中国人民是否有正确的了解,这一点并不能确定。 (questionable)
25. The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is A: [A] harmful B: [B] desirable C: [C] profound D: [D] questionable
25. The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is A: [A] harmful B: [B] desirable C: [C] profound D: [D] questionable
I suspect this procedure still obtains.Which of the following is the writer’s opinion? A: The procedure disappears forever. B: The procedure is hard to understand. C: The procedure is questionable. D: The procedure still exists now.
I suspect this procedure still obtains.Which of the following is the writer’s opinion? A: The procedure disappears forever. B: The procedure is hard to understand. C: The procedure is questionable. D: The procedure still exists now.
The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is____ A: harmful. B: desirable. C: profound. D: questionable. 未知类型:{'label': None, 'content': '', 'isMemberControl': 0, 'type': 181}
The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is____ A: harmful. B: desirable. C: profound. D: questionable. 未知类型:{'label': None, 'content': '', 'isMemberControl': 0, 'type': 181}
The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is________ 未知类型:{'label': 'questionDesc', 'content': '请选出本题正确答案', 'isMemberControl': 0, 'type': 181} A: harmful. B: desirable. C: profound. D: questionable.
The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure is________ 未知类型:{'label': 'questionDesc', 'content': '请选出本题正确答案', 'isMemberControl': 0, 'type': 181} A: harmful. B: desirable. C: profound. D: questionable.
The question of why infantile amnesia occurs has intrigued psychologists for decades, especially in light of ample evidence that infants and young children can display impressive memory capabilities. The word “ample” in this sentence is closest in meaning to_____. A: plentiful B: questionable C: surprising D: convincing
The question of why infantile amnesia occurs has intrigued psychologists for decades, especially in light of ample evidence that infants and young children can display impressive memory capabilities. The word “ample” in this sentence is closest in meaning to_____. A: plentiful B: questionable C: surprising D: convincing
四级阅读练习 The Internet has enabled the spread of information at lightning speed. This information revolution has created tremendous business opportunities for online publishers, but not all of them maintain proper quality-control mechanisms to ensure that only good information is being shared. Instead, many publishers aim simply to make money by whatever means possible, with no regard for the implications for society at large. When selfish publishers set up shops online, the primary goal is to publish as much as possible, often at the cost of quality. In this respect, many publishers start numerous online journals focused on overlapping (重叠的) disciplines--- to increase the total number of published papers--- and hire young business managers who do not have any experience in either science or publishing. In some cases, online publishers even give up peer review, while still presenting themselves as scientific journals--- deception designed to take advantage of scientists who simply want to share their research. If publishers structure their business to make more revenue, it often does harm to their products. When publishers start journals with overlapping domains, in combination with the pressure to publish more studies, this could promote the publication of marginal or even questionable articles. Moreover, publishers with multiple overlapping journals and journals with very narrow specialties increase the demands on the time and efforts of willing reviews. With the fact that reviewers are generally not compensated for their time and effort, journal editors are often unable to find enough reviewers to keep up with the increased publication rate. To improve the situation and increase the trust in scientific community, the pressure to publish must be reduced. Funding and promotion decisions should not be based on the number of publications, but on the quality of those publications and a research’s long-term productivity and instructions. And that’s just the start. We need additional mechanisms, such as Beall’s list of predatory (掠夺的) publishers, to alert scientists to fake journals and fake articles. In addition, the price for online publication must be controlled and a mechanism must be put in place to honor and reward hard-working reviewers.
四级阅读练习 The Internet has enabled the spread of information at lightning speed. This information revolution has created tremendous business opportunities for online publishers, but not all of them maintain proper quality-control mechanisms to ensure that only good information is being shared. Instead, many publishers aim simply to make money by whatever means possible, with no regard for the implications for society at large. When selfish publishers set up shops online, the primary goal is to publish as much as possible, often at the cost of quality. In this respect, many publishers start numerous online journals focused on overlapping (重叠的) disciplines--- to increase the total number of published papers--- and hire young business managers who do not have any experience in either science or publishing. In some cases, online publishers even give up peer review, while still presenting themselves as scientific journals--- deception designed to take advantage of scientists who simply want to share their research. If publishers structure their business to make more revenue, it often does harm to their products. When publishers start journals with overlapping domains, in combination with the pressure to publish more studies, this could promote the publication of marginal or even questionable articles. Moreover, publishers with multiple overlapping journals and journals with very narrow specialties increase the demands on the time and efforts of willing reviews. With the fact that reviewers are generally not compensated for their time and effort, journal editors are often unable to find enough reviewers to keep up with the increased publication rate. To improve the situation and increase the trust in scientific community, the pressure to publish must be reduced. Funding and promotion decisions should not be based on the number of publications, but on the quality of those publications and a research’s long-term productivity and instructions. And that’s just the start. We need additional mechanisms, such as Beall’s list of predatory (掠夺的) publishers, to alert scientists to fake journals and fake articles. In addition, the price for online publication must be controlled and a mechanism must be put in place to honor and reward hard-working reviewers.