Thus,it_____furtherinvestigationofwhethermfat-1expressionindiseasemodelssuchasnon-obesemicecanmitigatethedevelopmentoftype1diabetes.
Thus,it_____furtherinvestigationofwhethermfat-1expressionindiseasemodelssuchasnon-obesemicecanmitigatethedevelopmentoftype1diabetes.
Thus,congressionalcutstoaidinthenameofdeficitreductionareaneasyvote,but______.
Thus,congressionalcutstoaidinthenameofdeficitreductionareaneasyvote,but______.
【单选题】A. Even B. Though C. Thus D. So A. Even B. Though C. Thus D. So
【单选题】A. Even B. Though C. Thus D. So A. Even B. Though C. Thus D. So
智慧职教: Thus, Chinese food is( )and( ).
智慧职教: Thus, Chinese food is( )and( ).
28() A: And B: But C: Thus D: Then
28() A: And B: But C: Thus D: Then
A．thatB．thusC．thereD．this A: that B: thus C: there D: this
A．thatB．thusC．thereD．this A: that B: thus C: there D: this
The philosophy of non-contention states ... thus avoiding wars.
The philosophy of non-contention states ... thus avoiding wars.
Thus, congressional cuts to aid in the n...sy vote, but ______.
Thus, congressional cuts to aid in the n...sy vote, but ______.
Buyers are good negotiators, and thus they are good actors. ( )
Buyers are good negotiators, and thus they are good actors. ( )
Legislator:Tokeepourfoodsafe,wemustprohibittheuseofanyfoodadditivesthathavebeenfoundtocausecancer.<br/>Commentator.Anabsoluteprohibitionisexcessive.Today’stestscandetectasinglemoleculeofpotentiallycancer-causingsubstances,butweknowthatconsumingsignificantlylargeramountsofsuchachemicaldoesnotincreaseone’sriskofgettingcancer.Thus,weshouldinsteadsetamaximumacceptablelevelforeachproblematicchemical,somewhatbelowthelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerbutabovezero.<br/>Ofthefollowing,whichone,iftrue,isthelogicallystrongestcounterthelegislatorcanmaketothecommentator’sargument? A: Thelevelatwhichagivenfoodadditivehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerinchildrenisgenerallyabouthalfthelevelatwhichitleadstocancerinadults. B: Consumingsmallamountsofseveraldifferentcanner-causingchemicalscanleadtocancerevenifconsumingsuchanamountofanyonecancer-causingchemicalwouldnot. C: Thelawwouldprohibitonlythedeliberateadditionofcancer-causingchemicalsandwouldnotrequiretheremovalofnaturallyoccurringcancer-causingsubstances. D: Forsomefoodadditives,thelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerislowerthanthelevelatwhichtheadditiveprovidesanybenefit. E: Allfoodadditiveshavesubstitutesthatcanbeusedintheirplace.
Legislator:Tokeepourfoodsafe,wemustprohibittheuseofanyfoodadditivesthathavebeenfoundtocausecancer.<br/>Commentator.Anabsoluteprohibitionisexcessive.Today’stestscandetectasinglemoleculeofpotentiallycancer-causingsubstances,butweknowthatconsumingsignificantlylargeramountsofsuchachemicaldoesnotincreaseone’sriskofgettingcancer.Thus,weshouldinsteadsetamaximumacceptablelevelforeachproblematicchemical,somewhatbelowthelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerbutabovezero.<br/>Ofthefollowing,whichone,iftrue,isthelogicallystrongestcounterthelegislatorcanmaketothecommentator’sargument? A: Thelevelatwhichagivenfoodadditivehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerinchildrenisgenerallyabouthalfthelevelatwhichitleadstocancerinadults. B: Consumingsmallamountsofseveraldifferentcanner-causingchemicalscanleadtocancerevenifconsumingsuchanamountofanyonecancer-causingchemicalwouldnot. C: Thelawwouldprohibitonlythedeliberateadditionofcancer-causingchemicalsandwouldnotrequiretheremovalofnaturallyoccurringcancer-causingsubstances. D: Forsomefoodadditives,thelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerislowerthanthelevelatwhichtheadditiveprovidesanybenefit. E: Allfoodadditiveshavesubstitutesthatcanbeusedintheirplace.