We're staying on with Jon Stewart. This is how we believe his argument is played out:1. People should correct injustice.2. People not doing their job is injustice.3. Congressmen didn't do their job.4. Congressmen should now do their job. What kind of reasoning is this?
A: Reasoning from specific instances.
B: Reasoning from principle.
C: Causal reasoning
D: Analogical reasoning
A: Reasoning from specific instances.
B: Reasoning from principle.
C: Causal reasoning
D: Analogical reasoning
举一反三
- We're staying on with Jon Stewart. This is how we believe his argument is played out:1. People should correct injustice.2. People not doing their job is injustice.3. Congressmen didn't do their job.4. Congressmen should now do their job. What kind of reasoning is this? A: Reasoning from specific instances. B: Reasoning from principle. C: Causal reasoning D: Analogical reasoning
- Because it moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion, reasoning from principle is the opposite of reasoning from specific instances.
- __________ means you reason by comparing two similar cases. A: Reasoning from principle B: Reasoning form specific instances C: Analogical reasoning D: none of the above
- “Because that patch of ice was there, I fell and broke my arm.” This is an example of ______. A: causal reasoning B: analogical reasoning C: reasoning from principle D: none of the above
- Syllogism is a kind of deductive reasoning (from general to specific). A: 正确 B: 错误