案例分析题 The judge didn't award compensation to the chain store because ______.
A: the store was responsible for what happened
B: the report of the event benefited the store a lot
C: the tramp had stolen nothing of value
D: the tramp was penniless
A: the store was responsible for what happened
B: the report of the event benefited the store a lot
C: the tramp had stolen nothing of value
D: the tramp was penniless
举一反三
- 百货大赛 A: department store B: convenience store C: chain store
- chain store
- The store had to ________ a number of clerks because sales were down.
- If a customer visiting a departmental store cannot find his desired soap manufactured by Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) in the store, which of the following chain partner will he hold responsible for the non-availability of the soap? A: The suppliers of raw materials and components B: The distributor C: The logistics service provider D: Hindustan Unilever Ltd E: The departmental store
- 储手段( store of value)