Which is true of reasoning by example?
A: To apply a general principle to a specific instance.
B: To come to a conclusion from a number of specific cases.
C: To draw a comparison between two specific cases.
D: To reveal the cause-effect relationship between two cases.
A: To apply a general principle to a specific instance.
B: To come to a conclusion from a number of specific cases.
C: To draw a comparison between two specific cases.
D: To reveal the cause-effect relationship between two cases.
B
举一反三
- Reasoning by example means ______. A: entertaining reader with lively and personal stories B: moving from specific cases to a general conclusion C: moving from a general conclusion to a specific case D: revealing cause-effect relationship between two cases
- In U.S.A., there are two different types of cases: criminal cases and civil cases.
- __________ means you reason by comparing two similar cases. A: Reasoning from principle B: Reasoning form specific instances C: Analogical reasoning D: none of the above
- Because it moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion, reasoning from principle is the opposite of reasoning from specific instances.
- What are the key aspects of evaluating analogical arguments? A: Are the two cases compared truly similar? B: Are the similarities between the two cases relevant to the thesis? C: Are there many similarities between the two cases? D: Can the similarities between the two cases cover different aspects?
内容
- 0
10. _____ cases are these? They are their cases. A: Whose B: Who C: How D: What
- 1
1.2 ______ is the study of two languages in contrast in an attempt to identify general and specific differences between them
- 2
Hyponymy is the relationship which obtains between specific and general lexical items. The word that is more general in meaning is called s______ .
- 3
____ is not a possible relationship between the use cases. A: Include B: Implementation C: Generalization D: Extend
- 4
Syllogism is a kind of deductive reasoning (from general to specific). A: 正确 B: 错误