Which is true of reasoning by example?
A: To apply a general principle to a specific instance.
B: To come to a conclusion from a number of specific cases.
C: To draw a comparison between two specific cases.
D: To reveal the cause-effect relationship between two cases.
A: To apply a general principle to a specific instance.
B: To come to a conclusion from a number of specific cases.
C: To draw a comparison between two specific cases.
D: To reveal the cause-effect relationship between two cases.
举一反三
- Reasoning by example means ______. A: entertaining reader with lively and personal stories B: moving from specific cases to a general conclusion C: moving from a general conclusion to a specific case D: revealing cause-effect relationship between two cases
- In U.S.A., there are two different types of cases: criminal cases and civil cases.
- __________ means you reason by comparing two similar cases. A: Reasoning from principle B: Reasoning form specific instances C: Analogical reasoning D: none of the above
- Because it moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion, reasoning from principle is the opposite of reasoning from specific instances.
- What are the key aspects of evaluating analogical arguments? A: Are the two cases compared truly similar? B: Are the similarities between the two cases relevant to the thesis? C: Are there many similarities between the two cases? D: Can the similarities between the two cases cover different aspects?