Tom was a diligent, deferential legislator, but everyone knew that he hadn’t earned the seat he had inherited it.. A: passionate B: communicable C: hypothetical D: respectful
Tom was a diligent, deferential legislator, but everyone knew that he hadn’t earned the seat he had inherited it.. A: passionate B: communicable C: hypothetical D: respectful
Legislator:Tokeepourfoodsafe,wemustprohibittheuseofanyfoodadditivesthathavebeenfoundtocausecancer.<br/>Commentator.Anabsoluteprohibitionisexcessive.Today’stestscandetectasinglemoleculeofpotentiallycancer-causingsubstances,butweknowthatconsumingsignificantlylargeramountsofsuchachemicaldoesnotincreaseone’sriskofgettingcancer.Thus,weshouldinsteadsetamaximumacceptablelevelforeachproblematicchemical,somewhatbelowthelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerbutabovezero.<br/>Ofthefollowing,whichone,iftrue,isthelogicallystrongestcounterthelegislatorcanmaketothecommentator’sargument? A: Thelevelatwhichagivenfoodadditivehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerinchildrenisgenerallyabouthalfthelevelatwhichitleadstocancerinadults. B: Consumingsmallamountsofseveraldifferentcanner-causingchemicalscanleadtocancerevenifconsumingsuchanamountofanyonecancer-causingchemicalwouldnot. C: Thelawwouldprohibitonlythedeliberateadditionofcancer-causingchemicalsandwouldnotrequiretheremovalofnaturallyoccurringcancer-causingsubstances. D: Forsomefoodadditives,thelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerislowerthanthelevelatwhichtheadditiveprovidesanybenefit. E: Allfoodadditiveshavesubstitutesthatcanbeusedintheirplace.
Legislator:Tokeepourfoodsafe,wemustprohibittheuseofanyfoodadditivesthathavebeenfoundtocausecancer.<br/>Commentator.Anabsoluteprohibitionisexcessive.Today’stestscandetectasinglemoleculeofpotentiallycancer-causingsubstances,butweknowthatconsumingsignificantlylargeramountsofsuchachemicaldoesnotincreaseone’sriskofgettingcancer.Thus,weshouldinsteadsetamaximumacceptablelevelforeachproblematicchemical,somewhatbelowthelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerbutabovezero.<br/>Ofthefollowing,whichone,iftrue,isthelogicallystrongestcounterthelegislatorcanmaketothecommentator’sargument? A: Thelevelatwhichagivenfoodadditivehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerinchildrenisgenerallyabouthalfthelevelatwhichitleadstocancerinadults. B: Consumingsmallamountsofseveraldifferentcanner-causingchemicalscanleadtocancerevenifconsumingsuchanamountofanyonecancer-causingchemicalwouldnot. C: Thelawwouldprohibitonlythedeliberateadditionofcancer-causingchemicalsandwouldnotrequiretheremovalofnaturallyoccurringcancer-causingsubstances. D: Forsomefoodadditives,thelevelatwhichthesubstancehasbeenshowntoleadtocancerislowerthanthelevelatwhichtheadditiveprovidesanybenefit. E: Allfoodadditiveshavesubstitutesthatcanbeusedintheirplace.