中国大学MOOC: The Japanese company sued the American company because it had ___________ the contract.
中国大学MOOC: The Japanese company sued the American company because it had ___________ the contract.
The bridge company sued the county for the full price of the bridge on the undisputed ground that the county had ________ the contract.
The bridge company sued the county for the full price of the bridge on the undisputed ground that the county had ________ the contract.
He may be sued for ________ secrets of the company. A: reveal B: revealing C: relate D: relating
He may be sued for ________ secrets of the company. A: reveal B: revealing C: relate D: relating
The Japanese company sued the American company because it had ___________ the contract. A: adjoined B: reversed C: breached D: complicated
The Japanese company sued the American company because it had ___________ the contract. A: adjoined B: reversed C: breached D: complicated
A corporation is a legal entity separate from its owners; it may sue and be sued, but it may not own property in its own name.
A corporation is a legal entity separate from its owners; it may sue and be sued, but it may not own property in its own name.
The bridge company sued the county for the full price of the bridge on the undisputed ground that the county had ________ the contract. A: adjoined B: reversed C: breached D: complicated
The bridge company sued the county for the full price of the bridge on the undisputed ground that the county had ________ the contract. A: adjoined B: reversed C: breached D: complicated
A corporation is a legal entity separate from its owners; it may sue and be sued, but it may not own property in its own name. A: 正确 B: 错误
A corporation is a legal entity separate from its owners; it may sue and be sued, but it may not own property in its own name. A: 正确 B: 错误
中国大学MOOC: Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
中国大学MOOC: Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use?
Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use? A: Remoteness of Damage B: Absolute Privilege C: Legalised by prescription D: Contributory Negligence
Case Study: A pedestrian crossed a road without looking, and consequently was hit by a speeding car. The pedestrian sued the driver for negligence. What defence may the driver use? A: Remoteness of Damage B: Absolute Privilege C: Legalised by prescription D: Contributory Negligence
Hart cited a case in an Australian court to indicate that______. A: the high court should weigh in immediately on the issue B: problems for American media companies are getting more difficult C: the jurisdictional decision will have a chilling effect on companies D: American online publishers might be sued in foreign courts
Hart cited a case in an Australian court to indicate that______. A: the high court should weigh in immediately on the issue B: problems for American media companies are getting more difficult C: the jurisdictional decision will have a chilling effect on companies D: American online publishers might be sued in foreign courts