• 2022-06-09 问题

    中国大学MOOC: Which of the following describe the halo error?

    中国大学MOOC: Which of the following describe the halo error?

  • 2022-06-09 问题

    The word "halo"in "The Sound of Silence" means( ). A: barrier B: surroundings C: bright circle D: salute

    The word "halo"in "The Sound of Silence" means( ). A: barrier B: surroundings C: bright circle D: salute

  • 2022-06-07 问题

    中国大学MOOC: The Halo City Employment Fair is normally held during ________ in which large numbers of job seekers are looking for work.

    中国大学MOOC: The Halo City Employment Fair is normally held during ________ in which large numbers of job seekers are looking for work.

  • 2022-06-06 问题

    What does the circular halo placed behind the head signify in the art of the Middle Ages A: Divinity. B: Sainthood. C: God. D: Sky.

    What does the circular halo placed behind the head signify in the art of the Middle Ages A: Divinity. B: Sainthood. C: God. D: Sky.

  • 2022-06-06 问题

    __________ is the grouping of ratings at thepositive end of the performance scale instead of spreading them throughout the scale. A: leniency B: central tendency C: recency D: halo effect E: strictness

    __________ is the grouping of ratings at thepositive end of the performance scale instead of spreading them throughout the scale. A: leniency B: central tendency C: recency D: halo effect E: strictness

  • 2022-05-27 问题

    上颈椎损伤治疗中错误的是:() A: Jefferson骨折可行Halo架固定12周 B: 齿状突Ⅰ型骨折一般采用非手术治疗 C: 齿状突Ⅱ型骨折无移位一般采用非手术治疗 D: 枢椎椎弓骨折:无移位的halo架固定。 E: 齿状突Ⅲ型骨折一般采用手术治疗

    上颈椎损伤治疗中错误的是:() A: Jefferson骨折可行Halo架固定12周 B: 齿状突Ⅰ型骨折一般采用非手术治疗 C: 齿状突Ⅱ型骨折无移位一般采用非手术治疗 D: 枢椎椎弓骨折:无移位的halo架固定。 E: 齿状突Ⅲ型骨折一般采用手术治疗

  • 2021-04-14 问题

    晕轮效应(Halo Effect),以太阳光环向外弥散为比喻,指对他人某方面的印象决定了对其总体看法,以偏概全

    晕轮效应(Halo Effect),以太阳光环向外弥散为比喻,指对他人某方面的印象决定了对其总体看法,以偏概全

  • 2022-06-09 问题

    Which of the following statements best explains the "halo and horn" effect() A: The interviewer's judgment is important to a job applicant. B: The interviewer's judgment is affected by what he sees. C: The interviewer's judgment is objective if he is not blind. D: The interviewer's judgment is based on objective observation.

    Which of the following statements best explains the "halo and horn" effect() A: The interviewer's judgment is important to a job applicant. B: The interviewer's judgment is affected by what he sees. C: The interviewer's judgment is objective if he is not blind. D: The interviewer's judgment is based on objective observation.

  • 2022-06-09 问题

    1_____, darkness my old friendI’ve come to talk with you again Because a 2______ softly creeping Left its 3_______ while I was sleeping And the 4_______ that was planted In my brain still remains 5______ the sound of silence In restless dreams I walked along Narrow streets of cobble stone 6_______ the halo of a street lamp I turned my collar to the cold and dampWhen my7 _____ were stabbed By the8 ______ of a neon light That split the lightAnd touched the sound of silence

    1_____, darkness my old friendI’ve come to talk with you again Because a 2______ softly creeping Left its 3_______ while I was sleeping And the 4_______ that was planted In my brain still remains 5______ the sound of silence In restless dreams I walked along Narrow streets of cobble stone 6_______ the halo of a street lamp I turned my collar to the cold and dampWhen my7 _____ were stabbed By the8 ______ of a neon light That split the lightAnd touched the sound of silence

  • 2021-04-14 问题

    Nothing succeeds in business books like the study of success. The current business-book boom was launched in 1982 by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman with In Search of Excellence. The trend has continued with a succession of experts and would-be experts who promise to distil the essence of excellence into three (or five or seven) simple rules.The Three Rules is a self-conscious contribution to this type of writing; it even includes a bibliography of “success studies”. Michael Raynor and Mumtaz Ahmed work for a consultancy, Deloitte, that is determined to turn itself into more of a thought-leader and less a corporate repairman. They employ all the tricks of the success books. They insist that their conclusions are “measurable and actionable”-guides to behaviour rather than analysis for its own sake. Success authors usually serve up vivid stories about how exceptional businesspeople stamped their personalities on a company or rescued it from a life-threatening crisis. Messrs Raynor and Ahmed are happier chewing the numbers: they provide detailed appendices on “calculating the elements of advantage” and “detailed analysis”.The authors spent five years studying the behaviour of their 344 “ exceptional companies” only to come up at first with nothing. Every hunch (直觉) led to a blind alley and every hypothesis to a dead end. It was only when they shifted their attention from how companies behave to how they think that they began to make sense of their voluminous material.Management is all about making difficult tradeoffs in conditions that are always uncertain and often fast-changing. But exceptional companies approach these tradeoffs with two simple rules in mind, sometimes consciously, sometimes unconsciously. First: better before cheaper. Companies are more likely to succeed in the long run if they compete on quality or performance than on price. Second: revenue before cost. Companies have more to gain in the long run from driving up revenue than by driving down costs.Most success studies suffer from two faults. There is “the halo (光环)effect”, whereby good performance leads commentators to attribute all manner of virtues to anything and everything the company does. These virtues then suddenly become vices when the company fails. Messrs Raynor and Ahmed work hard to avoid these mistakes by studying large bodies of data over several decades. But they end up embracing a different error: stating the obvious. Most businesspeople will not be surprised to learn that it is better to find a profitable niche(隙缝市场)and focus on boosting your revenues than to compete on price and cut your way to success. The difficult question is how to find that profitable niche and protect it. There, The Three Rules is less useful.

    Nothing succeeds in business books like the study of success. The current business-book boom was launched in 1982 by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman with In Search of Excellence. The trend has continued with a succession of experts and would-be experts who promise to distil the essence of excellence into three (or five or seven) simple rules.The Three Rules is a self-conscious contribution to this type of writing; it even includes a bibliography of “success studies”. Michael Raynor and Mumtaz Ahmed work for a consultancy, Deloitte, that is determined to turn itself into more of a thought-leader and less a corporate repairman. They employ all the tricks of the success books. They insist that their conclusions are “measurable and actionable”-guides to behaviour rather than analysis for its own sake. Success authors usually serve up vivid stories about how exceptional businesspeople stamped their personalities on a company or rescued it from a life-threatening crisis. Messrs Raynor and Ahmed are happier chewing the numbers: they provide detailed appendices on “calculating the elements of advantage” and “detailed analysis”.The authors spent five years studying the behaviour of their 344 “ exceptional companies” only to come up at first with nothing. Every hunch (直觉) led to a blind alley and every hypothesis to a dead end. It was only when they shifted their attention from how companies behave to how they think that they began to make sense of their voluminous material.Management is all about making difficult tradeoffs in conditions that are always uncertain and often fast-changing. But exceptional companies approach these tradeoffs with two simple rules in mind, sometimes consciously, sometimes unconsciously. First: better before cheaper. Companies are more likely to succeed in the long run if they compete on quality or performance than on price. Second: revenue before cost. Companies have more to gain in the long run from driving up revenue than by driving down costs.Most success studies suffer from two faults. There is “the halo (光环)effect”, whereby good performance leads commentators to attribute all manner of virtues to anything and everything the company does. These virtues then suddenly become vices when the company fails. Messrs Raynor and Ahmed work hard to avoid these mistakes by studying large bodies of data over several decades. But they end up embracing a different error: stating the obvious. Most businesspeople will not be surprised to learn that it is better to find a profitable niche(隙缝市场)and focus on boosting your revenues than to compete on price and cut your way to success. The difficult question is how to find that profitable niche and protect it. There, The Three Rules is less useful.

  • 1