If the reviewer gives a lot of critical comments and requests for modification, what are the correct attitudes we should have?
举一反三
- What should we do in writing a scientific paper? </p></p>
- What is the benefit from serving as a reviewer for a journal or conference? </p></p>
- Which one is<br/>not the good advices on responding to reviewers? A: We need to<br/>examine carefully all the comments made by the reviewers and the<br/>Associate Editor. B: We have to<br/>differentiate those comments that must be fully addressed from those<br/>that are desirable to be addressed. C: We only need to<br/>address the comments that they are correct as we believe. D: We need to<br/>respond to EACH and EVERY point raised by the reviewer and the<br/>referee.
- Which is the WRONG response to reviewers if we don’t agree with their comments? </p></p>
- The fact that so many people have posted comments on this topic shows how ______ and complicated it is. </p></p>