What does the man say about Bob（） A: He’s been to Seattle many times. B: He has chaired a lot of conferences. C: He has a high position in his company. D: He lived in Seattle for many years.
What does the man say about Bob（） A: He’s been to Seattle many times. B: He has chaired a lot of conferences. C: He has a high position in his company. D: He lived in Seattle for many years.
The 2020 G20 ( the Group of 20 major economies) Leaders' Summit was held virtually on Nov. 21 to 22, chaired by Saudi King. G20 countries include seven Asian countries, namely China, Japan, Saudi Arabia _________________. A: India, South Korea, Turkey and Indonesia. B: Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea,and Israel C: Afghanistan, the Philippines, Mongolia and South Korea D: Iraq, Pakistan, Bangladesh and South Korea
The 2020 G20 ( the Group of 20 major economies) Leaders' Summit was held virtually on Nov. 21 to 22, chaired by Saudi King. G20 countries include seven Asian countries, namely China, Japan, Saudi Arabia _________________. A: India, South Korea, Turkey and Indonesia. B: Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea,and Israel C: Afghanistan, the Philippines, Mongolia and South Korea D: Iraq, Pakistan, Bangladesh and South Korea
在中国农历新年的第一天，习近平主席亲自作出指挥部署，向疫情全面宣战。中国政府迅速建立起联防联控的举国体制，李克强总理亲赴武汉指导抗疫。从中央到地方，从城市到农村，我们以壮士断腕的决心，果断采取最全面、最严格、最彻底的举措迎击疫情。 On the very day of the 1 , President Xi Jinping personally chaired a meeting to direct the outbreak response, 2 an all-out war on the epidemic. The government promptly established a 3 of comprehensive, inter-agency response. Premier Li Keqiang went to Wuhan, the 4 of the outbreak, to inspect epidemic control efforts. From the central government to local governments, from urban to 5 areas, the whole nation is battling the epidemic with 6 and self-sacrifice. Nothing short of the most comprehensive, rigorous and 7 measures have been taken. A. national framework B. resolve C. declaring D. thorough-going E. epicenter F. lunar new year G. rural
在中国农历新年的第一天，习近平主席亲自作出指挥部署，向疫情全面宣战。中国政府迅速建立起联防联控的举国体制，李克强总理亲赴武汉指导抗疫。从中央到地方，从城市到农村，我们以壮士断腕的决心，果断采取最全面、最严格、最彻底的举措迎击疫情。 On the very day of the 1 , President Xi Jinping personally chaired a meeting to direct the outbreak response, 2 an all-out war on the epidemic. The government promptly established a 3 of comprehensive, inter-agency response. Premier Li Keqiang went to Wuhan, the 4 of the outbreak, to inspect epidemic control efforts. From the central government to local governments, from urban to 5 areas, the whole nation is battling the epidemic with 6 and self-sacrifice. Nothing short of the most comprehensive, rigorous and 7 measures have been taken. A. national framework B. resolve C. declaring D. thorough-going E. epicenter F. lunar new year G. rural
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics predicted that the integrity of academic research would be compromised by patent-grubbing and attempts to build companies around the latest laboratory findings. But such fears did not come true, says a new report from the National Academics released Monday. The panel—chaired by Mark Wrighton. Chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis—examined a vast file of scholarly work on how universities have managed intellectual property in the wake of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act and concluded that things are pretty much hunky-dory (极好的) right now. Or, as the report says: The Bayh-Dole legal framework and the practices of universities have not seriously undermined academic norms of uninhibited inquiry, open communication, or faculty advancement based on scholarly merit. There is little evidence that intellectual property considerations interfere with other important avenues of transferring research results to development and commercial use. At the same time, however, the Academies’ panel warns universities not to go overboard hunting for patents. While some universities have made millions of dollars by licensing discoveries from their labs, raising money should not be the main goal. Instead, the report says, universities should aim to disseminate (传播) technology as widely as possible for the public good. This may mean passing up the best-paying licensing deal and taking one that allows for broader use of the technology. For most schools, it adds, the likelihood of “raising significant revenue, from patents is small, the probability of disappointment is high, and the risk of “distorting and narrowing” the use of new knowledge is great It’s important not to get carried away with racking up patents at the expense of the university’s primary obligation to disseminate new knowledge and technologies, says panel member David Korn assistant provost (教务长) for research at Harvard University. A former dean of the Stanford University Medical School, Korn was involved in reviewing a set of high-minded guidelines for universities that were largely adopted by the panel. These “Nine Points to Consider in Licensing” were previously endorsed by the Association of University Technology Managers. The phrase “racking up” (Line 1, Para. 4) means.
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics predicted that the integrity of academic research would be compromised by patent-grubbing and attempts to build companies around the latest laboratory findings. But such fears did not come true, says a new report from the National Academics released Monday. The panel—chaired by Mark Wrighton. Chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis—examined a vast file of scholarly work on how universities have managed intellectual property in the wake of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act and concluded that things are pretty much hunky-dory (极好的) right now. Or, as the report says: The Bayh-Dole legal framework and the practices of universities have not seriously undermined academic norms of uninhibited inquiry, open communication, or faculty advancement based on scholarly merit. There is little evidence that intellectual property considerations interfere with other important avenues of transferring research results to development and commercial use. At the same time, however, the Academies’ panel warns universities not to go overboard hunting for patents. While some universities have made millions of dollars by licensing discoveries from their labs, raising money should not be the main goal. Instead, the report says, universities should aim to disseminate (传播) technology as widely as possible for the public good. This may mean passing up the best-paying licensing deal and taking one that allows for broader use of the technology. For most schools, it adds, the likelihood of “raising significant revenue, from patents is small, the probability of disappointment is high, and the risk of “distorting and narrowing” the use of new knowledge is great It’s important not to get carried away with racking up patents at the expense of the university’s primary obligation to disseminate new knowledge and technologies, says panel member David Korn assistant provost (教务长) for research at Harvard University. A former dean of the Stanford University Medical School, Korn was involved in reviewing a set of high-minded guidelines for universities that were largely adopted by the panel. These “Nine Points to Consider in Licensing” were previously endorsed by the Association of University Technology Managers. The phrase “racking up” (Line 1, Para. 4) means.